 |
 |
|
 |
|
Bush Campaign Ads . . . Brought to You by Special Interests
As President Bush's $10.5 million campaign ad blitz begins, Public Citizen released a report outlining who helped pay for the campaign ads and what favors they have received during his presidency.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
No Child Left Behind? The Funding Gap in ESEA and Other Federal Education Programs
The current reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), raises high expectations for achievement and imposes stringent measures of accountability on students, teachers, and schools.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2, 2004
False Pretenses of Bush's Gay Marriage Reversal
In announcing his support for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage last week, President Bush said he was reversing his previous position on the issue because various states and courts had forced him to act. He cited recent actions to legalize gay marriage in Massachusetts, New Mexico and San Francisco as the specific impetuses for his action. However, according to the president's closest congressional ally on the gay marriage issue, this explanation is false -- the president made his decision months ago and well before actions by the states and courts.
Specifically, the Denver Rocky Mountain News reports that, while "the White House said President Bush made his decision only after officials in San Francisco and New Mexico presided over same-sex marriages,"1 Bush actually "pledged to Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO) that he would support her proposed constitutional amendment prohibiting gay marriage three months before" his public announcement last week2. The revelation is corroborated by the San Francisco Chronicle, which noted almost three months before last week's announcement that "the White House indicated Bush is considering" supporting the constitutional amendment. By contrast, the Massachusetts court ruled on February 6th4, San Francisco moved on February 11th5, and New Mexico acted on February 20th6.
While the new revelations show that the president's announcement was made under false pretenses, an analysis of the president and Vice President's past statements show that they were also misleading America four years ago in presenting a wholly different position on the gay marriage issue. On February 15, 2000, Bush said, "The state[s] can do what they want to"7 on issues surrounding gay marriage, and he reiterated this position on May 2, 2000, saying it is "going to be up for cities and states to make those decisions."8 Similarly, Vice President Cheney said on October 5, 2000, "I think the fact of the matter, of course, is [same-sex marriage] is regulated by the states. I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area."9
Sources:
- "Bush pledged to back ban in Nov., Musgrave aide says", Denver Rocky Mountain News, 02/28/2004.
- President Calls for Constitutional Amendment Protecting Marriage, 02/24/2004.
- San Francisco Chronicle, 12/2/03.
- "Massachusetts court upholds same-sex marriage", CNN, 02/06/2004.
- "San Francisco looks into gay marriage", Washington Times, 02/11/2004.
- "Gay couples marry in New Mexico", CNN, 02/20/2004.
- "South Carolina Republican Debate", CNN, 02/15/2004.
- "Should Same-Sex Couples Get the Same Rights and Recognition as Straight Ones?", CNN, 05/02/2000.
- Letter to the Senate Urging Opposition to the Marriage Constitutional Amendment, ACLU, 08/25/2003.
Send the Misleader to a Friend | Print It | Misleader Archive
|
|
