Misleader Home A Daily Chronicle of Bush Administration Distortion
Photo: Collage of President Bush and White House
Navigation: Who We Are Navigation: Special Reports Navigation: Ask the Experts Navigation: Feedback Navigation: Donate Navigation: Tell a Friend Navigation: Contact Us

Receive the Daily Mislead
Get a look past the rhetoric, every day, delivered to your inbox.

your email:

Member of the press?


             Privacy policy


In the Spotlight
Bush Campaign Ads . . . Brought to You by Special Interests
As President Bush's $10.5 million campaign ad blitz begins, Public Citizen released a report outlining who helped pay for the campaign ads and what favors they have received during his presidency.

Special Reports
No Child Left Behind? The Funding Gap in ESEA and Other Federal Education Programs
The current reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), raises high expectations for achievement and imposes stringent measures of accountability on students, teachers, and schools.

See the Ad


A Daily Chronicle of Bush Administration Distortion December 5, 2003
Send The Misleader to a Friend | Printer Friendly Version | Want the Mislead on your site?



     

Bush Backtracking on Cleaner Air



Tuesday, the Bush administration announced its revisions to mercury emission rules emissions, one day before President Bush asserted that "we all share duties of stewardship."1 The administration's alternative, a cap-and-trade system that was requested by the industry, would allow power plants to buy and sell the right to emit mercury.

While this system already exists with sulfur dioxide, the environmental community points out that pregnant women and young children are vulnerable to mercury exposure, leading to developmental problems. About one out of every 12 women (4.9 million) of childbearing age has unusually elevated levels of mercury, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta."2

President Bush nominated Mike Leavitt to head the Environmental Protection Agency while noting that it was important to be "vigilant in protecting the air and soil and waters around us."3 Newly installed, on the same day that he gave his introductory address to EPA employees, Leavitt said of the changes, "Frankly, we're just not satisfied with the level of reduction you get from the mercury MACT, so we're making the dual proposal."4

But a December 2001 Power Point presentation that then EPA administrator Christie Whitman indicated that the rules being rejected would have reduced emissions from the current 48 tons per year to 5 tons per year by 2007. The new proposal Leavitt's backing, however, calls for a reduction to 34 tons by 20105, and would install regulations "three times less stringent and would take 10 years longer to achieve than reductions critics say are required under the Clean Air Act."6

Leavitt said of the new mercury standards, "If you care about clean air, then what is there not to like?"7 Representatives of industry seem to agree, saying that the new rules will "work a lot better."8 One lawyer representing coal-fired plants suggested, "The environmental community has consistently overstated the health case for regulating mercury."9 But his assertion is contradicted by the EPA's own website, which says, "Methylmercury is highly toxic."10 More than 80 percent of states have some kind of warnings on consuming fish because of mercury.

Continuing the administration's habit of releasing potentially controversial environmental rules on the eve of holidays, the document was released the day before Thanksgiving.11

Sources:
  1. Bill Signing Ceremony, 12/3/03.
  2. "Bush administration weighs weaker rules on mercury pollution," Knight-Ridder, 12/02/03.
  3. Nomination of Gov. Leavitt as Administrator of EPA, 8/11/03.
  4. "White House, EPA Move To Ease Mercury Rules," Washington Post, 12/03/03, p. A01.
  5. "Bush administration weighs weaker rules on mercury pollution," Knight-Ridder, 12/02/03.
  6. "EPA mercury limits wouldn't meet Clean Air standards," Scripps Howard News Service, 12/2/03.
  7. "EPA proposes new rules to combat smog, soot," Salt Lake Tribune, 12/5/03.
  8. "EPA mercury limits wouldn't meet Clean Air standards," Scripps Howard News Service, 12/2/03.
  9. "Bush administration weighs weaker rules on mercury pollution," Knight-Ridder, 12/02/03.
  10. "Frequent Questions about Mercury," EPA.
  11. "White House, EPA Move To Ease Mercury Rules," Washington Post, 12/03/03, p. A01.



Send the Misleader to a Friend | Print It | Misleader Archive