Misleader Home A Daily Chronicle of Bush Administration Distortion
Photo: Collage of President Bush and White House
Navigation: Who We Are Navigation: Special Reports Navigation: Ask the Experts Navigation: Feedback Navigation: Donate Navigation: Tell a Friend Navigation: Contact Us

Receive the Daily Mislead
Get a look past the rhetoric, every day, delivered to your in-box by noon eastern.

your email:

Member of the press?


             Privacy policy


In the Spotlight
Bush Campaign Ads . . . Brought to You by Special Interests
As President Bush's $10.5 million campaign ad blitz begins, Public Citizen released a report outlining who helped pay for the campaign ads and what favors they have received during his presidency.


Special Reports
No Child Left Behind? The Funding Gap in ESEA and Other Federal Education Programs
The current reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB), raises high expectations for achievement and imposes stringent measures of accountability on students, teachers, and schools.


See the Ad



A Daily Chronicle of Bush Administration Distortion
Send The Misleader to a Friend | Printer Friendly Version | Want the Mislead on your site?



February 26, 2004 | Daily Mislead Archive

Bush Misleading on Social Security Begins



Yesterday, President Bush implicitly acknowledged for the first time that his Administration could attempt to reduce Social Security benefits for workers - a reversal from one of his core campaign pledges in 2000. Specifically, the president was asked his opinion on Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan's assertion that, in order to balance the budget, Social Security benefits should be cut1. Bush responded, "My position on Social Security benefits is this: those benefits should not be changed for people at or near retirement."2 However, the president specifically refused to say he opposed cutting future guaranteed benefits for younger and middle-aged workers.

The president's refusal to discuss younger workers was a departure from his very clear position in 2000 in which he said he did not support cuts in future Social Security benefits for anyone - young or old. Less than two months before the 2000 election, then-Governor Bush said in Florida that people were saying, "'You know, if George W. becomes the president, he's going to take away your Social Security check.'" To which Bush added, "Don't believe it. Here's my pledge to the people of Florida: A promise made by our government will be a promise kept when I become the president of the United States."3.

Certainly, President Bush has talked about his plan to privatize Social Security. However, he has obscured the fact that the plan could result in cuts to guaranteed benefits for younger workers. He has also declined to openly discuss the fact that, at a time of record deficits, his "own economic team estimates that a move to private accounts would add an additional $4.7 trillion to the debt"4. And, most importantly, Bush refused to fully disassociate himself with Greenspan's call to reduce benefits.

Sources:
  1. "Greenspan urges Social Security cuts", Salon, 02/25/2004.
  2. President Bush Welcomes Georgian President Saakashvili to White House, 02/25/2004.
  3. Bush speech, 9/11/2000.
  4. CBS News, 2/25/2004.



Send the Misleader to a Friend | Print It | Misleader Archive